texas, 1996 U.S. senator
gramm won with 55.49% · R+11.0 · 5,456,748 votes
| candidate | party | share | votes | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gramm | republican | 55.49% | 3,027,695 | |
| morales | democrat | 44.51% | 2,429,053 |
the 1996 general election for U.S. senator in Texas: the state above, then each of its 254 counties. open it on the map by precinct, or by county.
| county | result | margin | votes | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| anderson | gramm won with 56.10% | R+12.2 | 13,150 | map | |
| andrews | gramm won with 72.12% | R+44.2 | 3,917 | map | |
| angelina | gramm won with 57.40% | R+14.8 | 24,902 | map | |
| aransas | gramm won with 62.21% | R+24.4 | 7,209 | map | |
| archer | gramm won with 67.14% | R+34.3 | 3,555 | map | |
| armstrong | gramm won with 74.03% | R+48.1 | 905 | map | |
| atascosa | morales won with 51.88% | D+3.8 | 9,134 | map | |
| austin | gramm won with 66.44% | R+32.9 | 7,800 | map | |
| bailey | gramm won with 66.53% | R+33.1 | 2,005 | map | |
| bandera | gramm won with 75.23% | R+50.5 | 5,522 | map | |
| bastrop | morales won with 50.93% | D+1.9 | 14,216 | map | |
| baylor | gramm won with 57.62% | R+15.2 | 1,923 | map | |
| bee | morales won with 52.75% | D+5.5 | 8,596 | map | |
| bell | gramm won with 61.41% | R+22.8 | 54,919 | map | |
| bexar | morales won with 51.58% | D+3.2 | 355,619 | map | |
| blanco | gramm won with 65.76% | R+31.5 | 3,189 | map | |
| borden | gramm won with 70.89% | R+41.8 | 316 | map | |
| bosque | gramm won with 55.54% | R+11.1 | 5,814 | map | |
| bowie | gramm won with 56.43% | R+12.9 | 28,645 | map | |
| brazoria | gramm won with 61.60% | R+23.2 | 64,427 | map | |
| brazos | gramm won with 64.16% | R+28.3 | 36,181 | map | |
| brewster | morales won with 50.18% | D+0.4 | 3,268 | map | |
| briscoe | gramm won with 56.76% | R+13.5 | 865 | map | |
| brooks | morales won with 84.69% | D+69.4 | 3,299 | map | |
| brown | gramm won with 66.17% | R+32.3 | 11,569 | map | |
| burleson | gramm won with 53.02% | R+6.0 | 4,834 | map | |
| burnet | gramm won with 59.96% | R+19.9 | 10,856 | map | |
| caldwell | morales won with 53.60% | D+7.2 | 7,584 | map | |
| calhoun | gramm won with 54.09% | R+8.2 | 5,964 | map | |
| callahan | gramm won with 66.50% | R+33.0 | 4,594 | map | |
| cameron | morales won with 60.99% | D+22.0 | 53,392 | map | |
| camp | gramm won with 50.72% | R+1.4 | 3,279 | map | |
| carson | gramm won with 72.08% | R+44.2 | 2,686 | map | |
| cass | gramm won with 52.53% | R+5.1 | 10,610 | map | |
| castro | gramm won with 58.61% | R+17.2 | 2,440 | map | |
| chambers | gramm won with 63.00% | R+26.0 | 7,578 | map | |
| cherokee | gramm won with 60.03% | R+20.1 | 12,453 | map | |
| childress | gramm won with 65.07% | R+30.1 | 1,875 | map | |
| clay | gramm won with 62.81% | R+25.6 | 3,990 | map | |
| cochran | gramm won with 60.42% | R+20.8 | 1,243 | map | |
| coke | gramm won with 64.37% | R+28.7 | 1,496 | map | |
| coleman | gramm won with 62.90% | R+25.8 | 3,520 | map | |
| collin | gramm won with 70.22% | R+40.4 | 129,964 | map | |
| collingsworth | gramm won with 56.94% | R+13.9 | 1,398 | map | |
| colorado | gramm won with 58.08% | R+16.2 | 6,637 | map | |
| comal | gramm won with 71.32% | R+42.6 | 25,461 | map | |
| comanche | gramm won with 54.33% | R+8.7 | 4,631 | map | |
| concho | gramm won with 60.04% | R+20.1 | 996 | map | |
| cooke | gramm won with 66.85% | R+33.7 | 12,090 | map | |
| coryell | gramm won with 63.02% | R+26.0 | 13,640 | map | |
| cottle | morales won with 50.39% | D+0.8 | 762 | map | |
| crane | gramm won with 67.47% | R+34.9 | 1,746 | map | |
| crockett | gramm won with 55.37% | R+10.7 | 1,499 | map | |
| crosby | gramm won with 52.14% | R+4.3 | 2,169 | map | |
| culberson | morales won with 58.59% | D+17.2 | 995 | map | |
| dallam | gramm won with 73.05% | R+46.1 | 1,573 | map | |
| dallas | gramm won with 52.10% | R+4.2 | 540,847 | map | |
| dawson | gramm won with 62.85% | R+25.7 | 3,989 | map | |
| deaf smith | gramm won with 68.29% | R+36.6 | 4,945 | map | |
| delta | gramm won with 50.15% | R+0.3 | 1,679 | map | |
| denton | gramm won with 65.25% | R+30.5 | 109,412 | map | |
| dewitt | gramm won with 65.43% | R+30.9 | 5,970 | map | |
| dickens | gramm won with 50.60% | R+1.2 | 1,000 | map | |
| dimmit | morales won with 76.77% | D+53.5 | 2,919 | map | |
| donley | gramm won with 70.99% | R+42.0 | 1,551 | map | |
| duval | morales won with 85.97% | D+71.9 | 4,532 | map | |
| eastland | gramm won with 61.10% | R+22.2 | 6,442 | map | |
| ector | gramm won with 66.40% | R+32.8 | 31,863 | map | |
| edwards | gramm won with 58.97% | R+17.9 | 936 | map | |
| el paso | morales won with 57.60% | D+15.2 | 132,755 | map | |
| ellis | gramm won with 61.12% | R+22.2 | 29,247 | map | |
| erath | gramm won with 57.73% | R+15.5 | 9,411 | map | |
| falls | morales won with 52.48% | D+5.0 | 5,650 | map | |
| fannin | morales won with 50.87% | D+1.7 | 8,611 | map | |
| fayette | gramm won with 59.00% | R+18.0 | 7,954 | map | |
| fisher | morales won with 59.59% | D+19.2 | 1,794 | map | |
| floyd | gramm won with 68.14% | R+36.3 | 2,467 | map | |
| foard | morales won with 58.30% | D+16.6 | 566 | map | |
| fort bend | gramm won with 58.65% | R+17.3 | 91,382 | map | |
| franklin | gramm won with 57.75% | R+15.5 | 3,283 | map | |
| freestone | gramm won with 55.57% | R+11.1 | 5,998 | map | |
| frio | morales won with 65.55% | D+31.1 | 3,953 | map | |
| gaines | gramm won with 67.47% | R+34.9 | 3,096 | map | |
| galveston | morales won with 50.19% | D+0.4 | 78,279 | map | |
| garza | gramm won with 63.02% | R+26.0 | 1,663 | map | |
| gillespie | gramm won with 77.80% | R+55.6 | 7,967 | map | |
| glasscock | gramm won with 85.20% | R+70.4 | 473 | map | |
| goliad | gramm won with 57.24% | R+14.5 | 2,549 | map | |
| gonzales | gramm won with 59.94% | R+19.9 | 5,057 | map | |
| gray | gramm won with 78.40% | R+56.8 | 8,745 | map | |
| grayson | gramm won with 59.10% | R+18.2 | 34,786 | map | |
| gregg | gramm won with 66.46% | R+32.9 | 36,861 | map | |
| grimes | gramm won with 55.37% | R+10.7 | 5,451 | map | |
| guadalupe | gramm won with 66.82% | R+33.6 | 23,786 | map | |
| hale | gramm won with 68.59% | R+37.2 | 9,529 | map | |
| hall | gramm won with 51.44% | R+2.9 | 1,423 | map | |
| hamilton | gramm won with 58.85% | R+17.7 | 2,967 | map | |
| hansford | gramm won with 85.05% | R+70.1 | 1,927 | map | |
| hardeman | gramm won with 55.39% | R+10.8 | 1,446 | map | |
| hardin | gramm won with 59.79% | R+19.6 | 17,489 | map | |
| harris | gramm won with 54.19% | R+8.4 | 811,832 | map | |
| harrison | gramm won with 57.92% | R+15.8 | 21,212 | map | |
| hartley | gramm won with 76.32% | R+52.6 | 1,782 | map | |
| haskell | morales won with 51.61% | D+3.2 | 2,488 | map | |
| hays | gramm won with 52.41% | R+4.8 | 26,539 | map | |
| hemphill | gramm won with 74.60% | R+49.2 | 1,421 | map | |
| henderson | gramm won with 53.71% | R+7.4 | 22,380 | map | |
| hidalgo | morales won with 66.56% | D+33.1 | 81,605 | map | |
| hill | gramm won with 55.64% | R+11.3 | 9,287 | map | |
| hockley | gramm won with 70.84% | R+41.7 | 6,752 | map | |
| hood | gramm won with 58.98% | R+18.0 | 14,310 | map | |
| hopkins | gramm won with 50.71% | R+1.4 | 9,705 | map | |
| houston | gramm won with 56.36% | R+12.7 | 7,257 | map | |
| howard | gramm won with 61.71% | R+23.4 | 9,540 | map | |
| hudspeth | gramm won with 50.12% | R+0.2 | 842 | map | |
| hunt | gramm won with 57.05% | R+14.1 | 21,512 | map | |
| hutchinson | gramm won with 74.99% | R+50.0 | 9,692 | map | |
| irion | gramm won with 70.53% | R+41.1 | 655 | map | |
| jack | gramm won with 58.04% | R+16.1 | 2,424 | map | |
| jackson | gramm won with 61.72% | R+23.4 | 4,504 | map | |
| jasper | gramm won with 51.62% | R+3.2 | 10,416 | map | |
| jeff davis | gramm won with 60.40% | R+20.8 | 894 | map | |
| jefferson | morales won with 53.14% | D+6.3 | 82,463 | map | |
| jim hogg | morales won with 79.10% | D+58.2 | 1,794 | map | |
| jim wells | morales won with 66.84% | D+33.7 | 10,388 | map | |
| johnson | gramm won with 58.32% | R+16.6 | 31,907 | map | |
| jones | gramm won with 57.27% | R+14.5 | 5,261 | map | |
| karnes | gramm won with 50.99% | R+2.0 | 4,228 | map | |
| kaufman | gramm won with 55.38% | R+10.8 | 17,882 | map | |
| kendall | gramm won with 76.65% | R+53.3 | 8,538 | map | |
| kenedy | morales won with 61.86% | D+23.7 | 194 | map | |
| kent | gramm won with 51.27% | R+2.5 | 474 | map | |
| kerr | gramm won with 73.03% | R+46.1 | 16,406 | map | |
| kimble | gramm won with 67.50% | R+35.0 | 1,520 | map | |
| king | gramm won with 66.09% | R+32.2 | 174 | map | |
| kinney | gramm won with 59.90% | R+19.8 | 1,182 | map | |
| kleberg | morales won with 58.62% | D+17.2 | 8,890 | map | |
| knox | morales won with 50.53% | D+1.1 | 1,496 | map | |
| la salle | morales won with 69.49% | D+39.0 | 2,065 | map | |
| lamar | gramm won with 53.96% | R+7.9 | 13,526 | map | |
| lamb | gramm won with 66.72% | R+33.4 | 4,456 | map | |
| lampasas | gramm won with 66.55% | R+33.1 | 5,231 | map | |
| lavaca | gramm won with 58.78% | R+17.6 | 6,678 | map | |
| lee | gramm won with 57.35% | R+14.7 | 4,596 | map | |
| leon | gramm won with 61.63% | R+23.3 | 5,426 | map | |
| liberty | gramm won with 57.26% | R+14.5 | 16,316 | map | |
| limestone | gramm won with 50.89% | R+1.8 | 6,514 | map | |
| lipscomb | gramm won with 76.07% | R+52.1 | 1,287 | map | |
| live oak | gramm won with 61.59% | R+23.2 | 3,494 | map | |
| llano | gramm won with 62.09% | R+24.2 | 7,653 | map | |
| loving | gramm won with 75.00% | R+50.0 | 72 | map | |
| lubbock | gramm won with 69.84% | R+39.7 | 72,822 | map | |
| lynn | gramm won with 61.86% | R+23.7 | 2,124 | map | |
| madison | gramm won with 59.78% | R+19.6 | 3,277 | map | |
| marion | morales won with 52.46% | D+4.9 | 3,412 | map | |
| martin | gramm won with 66.71% | R+33.4 | 1,667 | map | |
| mason | gramm won with 63.74% | R+27.5 | 1,685 | map | |
| matagorda | gramm won with 55.96% | R+11.9 | 12,195 | map | |
| maverick | morales won with 80.45% | D+60.9 | 6,312 | map | |
| mcculloch | gramm won with 61.46% | R+22.9 | 2,893 | map | |
| mclennan | gramm won with 57.21% | R+14.4 | 61,866 | map | |
| mcmullen | gramm won with 70.17% | R+40.3 | 409 | map | |
| medina | gramm won with 62.20% | R+24.4 | 10,236 | map | |
| menard | gramm won with 55.34% | R+10.7 | 1,001 | map | |
| midland | gramm won with 76.52% | R+53.0 | 36,675 | map | |
| milam | morales won with 51.90% | D+3.8 | 7,414 | map | |
| mills | gramm won with 61.22% | R+22.4 | 1,965 | map | |
| mitchell | gramm won with 52.29% | R+4.6 | 2,316 | map | |
| montague | gramm won with 59.91% | R+19.8 | 6,396 | map | |
| montgomery | gramm won with 72.35% | R+44.7 | 76,194 | map | |
| moore | gramm won with 74.57% | R+49.1 | 5,001 | map | |
| morris | morales won with 60.20% | D+20.4 | 4,683 | map | |
| motley | gramm won with 71.97% | R+43.9 | 585 | map | |
| nacogdoches | gramm won with 61.71% | R+23.4 | 19,103 | map | |
| navarro | gramm won with 50.72% | R+1.4 | 12,347 | map | |
| newton | morales won with 60.60% | D+21.2 | 4,305 | map | |
| nolan | gramm won with 55.31% | R+10.6 | 5,245 | map | |
| nueces | morales won with 53.29% | D+6.6 | 91,363 | map | |
| ochiltree | gramm won with 85.65% | R+71.3 | 3,039 | map | |
| oldham | gramm won with 73.58% | R+47.2 | 916 | map | |
| orange | gramm won with 52.40% | R+4.8 | 28,733 | map | |
| palo pinto | morales won with 50.34% | D+0.7 | 8,473 | map | |
| panola | gramm won with 58.87% | R+17.7 | 8,841 | map | |
| parker | gramm won with 61.26% | R+22.5 | 26,443 | map | |
| parmer | gramm won with 76.46% | R+52.9 | 2,910 | map | |
| pecos | gramm won with 55.62% | R+11.2 | 3,844 | map | |
| polk | gramm won with 55.17% | R+10.3 | 13,851 | map | |
| potter | gramm won with 66.17% | R+32.3 | 25,697 | map | |
| presidio | morales won with 69.66% | D+39.3 | 1,579 | map | |
| rains | gramm won with 51.54% | R+3.1 | 2,625 | map | |
| randall | gramm won with 78.02% | R+56.0 | 38,965 | map | |
| reagan | gramm won with 67.03% | R+34.1 | 1,113 | map | |
| real | gramm won with 70.11% | R+40.2 | 1,335 | map | |
| red river | morales won with 51.68% | D+3.4 | 4,356 | map | |
| reeves | morales won with 64.00% | D+28.0 | 3,464 | map | |
| refugio | gramm won with 50.58% | R+1.2 | 3,171 | map | |
| roberts | gramm won with 84.01% | R+68.0 | 563 | map | |
| robertson | morales won with 56.66% | D+13.3 | 5,079 | map | |
| rockwall | gramm won with 72.69% | R+45.4 | 12,582 | map | |
| runnels | gramm won with 65.62% | R+31.2 | 3,633 | map | |
| rusk | gramm won with 64.80% | R+29.6 | 15,150 | map | |
| sabine | gramm won with 52.57% | R+5.1 | 3,812 | map | |
| san augustine | gramm won with 51.09% | R+2.2 | 3,345 | map | |
| san jacinto | gramm won with 55.14% | R+10.3 | 6,249 | map | |
| san patricio | gramm won with 52.49% | R+5.0 | 16,614 | map | |
| san saba | gramm won with 61.08% | R+22.2 | 1,814 | map | |
| schleicher | gramm won with 59.62% | R+19.2 | 1,154 | map | |
| scurry | gramm won with 64.65% | R+29.3 | 5,698 | map | |
| shackelford | gramm won with 67.85% | R+35.7 | 1,409 | map | |
| shelby | gramm won with 58.35% | R+16.7 | 7,864 | map | |
| sherman | gramm won with 79.39% | R+58.8 | 1,106 | map | |
| smith | gramm won with 66.38% | R+32.8 | 53,271 | map | |
| somervell | gramm won with 54.01% | R+8.0 | 2,307 | map | |
| starr | morales won with 87.44% | D+74.9 | 6,936 | map | |
| stephens | gramm won with 63.72% | R+27.4 | 3,217 | map | |
| sterling | gramm won with 75.91% | R+51.8 | 631 | map | |
| stonewall | morales won with 52.52% | D+5.0 | 853 | map | |
| sutton | gramm won with 61.37% | R+22.7 | 1,297 | map | |
| swisher | gramm won with 54.43% | R+8.9 | 2,537 | map | |
| tarrant | gramm won with 56.65% | R+13.3 | 401,623 | map | |
| taylor | gramm won with 69.22% | R+38.4 | 39,668 | map | |
| terrell | morales won with 56.49% | D+13.0 | 485 | map | |
| terry | gramm won with 65.85% | R+31.7 | 3,441 | map | |
| throckmorton | gramm won with 62.34% | R+24.7 | 701 | map | |
| titus | gramm won with 55.80% | R+11.6 | 7,747 | map | |
| tom green | gramm won with 65.86% | R+31.7 | 32,200 | map | |
| travis | morales won with 56.40% | D+12.8 | 239,816 | map | |
| trinity | morales won with 51.05% | D+2.1 | 5,185 | map | |
| tyler | gramm won with 51.90% | R+3.8 | 6,537 | map | |
| upshur | gramm won with 56.61% | R+13.2 | 11,110 | map | |
| upton | gramm won with 68.99% | R+38.0 | 1,148 | map | |
| uvalde | gramm won with 53.58% | R+7.2 | 7,185 | map | |
| val verde | morales won with 52.99% | D+6.0 | 10,364 | map | |
| van zandt | gramm won with 58.29% | R+16.6 | 14,720 | map | |
| victoria | gramm won with 64.95% | R+29.9 | 23,346 | map | |
| walker | gramm won with 59.54% | R+19.1 | 14,280 | map | |
| waller | morales won with 52.85% | D+5.7 | 8,431 | map | |
| ward | gramm won with 58.59% | R+17.2 | 3,601 | map | |
| washington | gramm won with 67.63% | R+35.3 | 10,271 | map | |
| webb | morales won with 74.63% | D+49.3 | 24,396 | map | |
| wharton | gramm won with 58.59% | R+17.2 | 12,071 | map | |
| wheeler | gramm won with 70.24% | R+40.5 | 2,221 | map | |
| wichita | gramm won with 62.97% | R+25.9 | 39,242 | map | |
| wilbarger | gramm won with 62.58% | R+25.2 | 4,140 | map | |
| willacy | morales won with 68.07% | D+36.1 | 5,192 | map | |
| williamson | gramm won with 60.72% | R+21.4 | 65,140 | map | |
| wilson | gramm won with 57.97% | R+15.9 | 8,851 | map | |
| winkler | gramm won with 63.68% | R+27.4 | 2,054 | map | |
| wise | gramm won with 56.64% | R+13.3 | 12,704 | map | |
| wood | gramm won with 60.58% | R+21.2 | 11,884 | map | |
| yoakum | gramm won with 69.28% | R+38.6 | 2,373 | map | |
| young | gramm won with 65.43% | R+30.9 | 6,531 | map | |
| zapata | morales won with 73.55% | D+47.1 | 2,355 | map | |
| zavala | morales won with 83.94% | D+67.9 | 3,058 | map |
- each unit is a county, 254 of them, each the exact sum of its precincts on the 2012 VTDs.
- every county in the file carries a return.
- the council’s precinct file carries only the two major candidates for this race. the secretary of state counted 5,527,441 votes in all; bird (libertarian) 51,516 and huff (natural law) 19,469 are not in it.
- data · texas legislative council, VTD returns, filed on 2012 lines; third-party totals, secretary of state canvass